Subjects Admissions test

TMUA

Two papers, 20 questions each, no calculator — and a very different skill from A-Level.

Admissions test £40 per hour Test of Mathematics for University Admission

The test

Two papers, each 20 multiple-choice questions in 75 minutes, with no calculator. The two scores combine into a single result reported from 1.0 to 9.0. There’s no pass mark — universities set their own expectations, and a strong score can turn into a reduced offer.

  • Paper 1 — applying familiar A-Level mathematics to unfamiliar situations
  • Paper 2 — mathematical reasoning: logic, proof, implication, counterexamples

Requirements change every admissions cycle, so always check your specific course pages. Broadly, it’s used by Cambridge, Imperial, Warwick, Durham, LSE and a growing group of others.

Why I can help

I sat the TMUA and scored in the top 10% nationally. That was recent enough that I remember the actual experience of the clock — which is most of what makes this test hard.

What we work on

Speed without carelessness. 75 minutes for 20 questions sounds generous until you meet a question that could eat fifteen of them. The skill is recognising that question and leaving it.

Eliminating rather than solving. These are multiple choice. Substituting a convenient value, checking a limiting case, or testing the sign of an expression will often kill three options in twenty seconds. Solving forwards is frequently the slow route.

Paper 2 properly. This is the paper most students under-prepare, because nothing in A-Level trains it. Necessary versus sufficient, the negation of a statement with a quantifier, spotting the exact line where a “proof” goes wrong — these are learnable, and quickly, but only if you practise them deliberately.

A common trap: students prepare for the TMUA by doing more A-Level questions. It doesn’t work. The content is almost entirely familiar — the difficulty is in the reasoning and the pace. Prepare with real past papers from the start.

How preparation usually runs

Six to ten weeks, one session a week, with timed practice between sessions. We start with a full paper cold to get a baseline, then alternate: one session on reasoning technique, one on reviewing a timed paper question by question. Every error gets classified — gap, too slow, careless slip, or misread — because the pattern tells us what to do next far better than the score does.

This can also be student-led, with paper and topic being provided before the session, and access to exclusive resources that I will provide in the lesson

Start with a free 30-minute trial

No cost, no commitment. We'll look at where you are, what's getting in the way, and how I'd help.